Another Mennonite attack

So this guy named "Samy" (obviously a Mennonite) attempts a mass shooting with AUTOMATIC weapons (wait....I thought those were "controlled" by a law), and is stopped by the FBI

.......but no Terrorism charges against "Samy"

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/fbi-thwarts-mass-shooting-at-milwaukee-masonic-temple-b99659005z1-366609371.html

...oh wait....he made this statement:

 "We are Muslims, defending Muslim religion, we are on our own, my dear, we have organized our own group,"

Whoops...sorry....never mind.....nothing to see here, move along citizen, move along

A bumper sticker

Thought of this today:

"How many gun crimes have LAW ABIDING CITIZENS  committed?"

Well the answer would be ZERO, since they are LAW ABIDING.

So, to the hoplos out there...how exactly would another LAW (or "Executive Action") solve anything?

Answer: It wouldn't.....it would ONLY take the tool away from the LAW ABIDING.


So the real question is this:  There are two types of people who would take guns away from LAW ABIDING citizens

a.  Tyrants
b.  Criminals


Which one are you Mr/Ms Hoplo?

KPTB's EA - 2nd post

Another post on yesterday's "action"

Mental Health -  KPTB's (illegal) "action" makes ANYONE who seeks ANY type of mental health lose their civil rights (after all, once you lose the 2nd, what's going to "stop" the government from removing the 1st, and 3rd, and 4th, and 5th.....)

some questions.

Who do you think this is targeted at?        

LAW ABIDING CITIZENS

Criminals will not pay attention....just like they already are doing with the THOUSANDS of gun laws already on the books.



What about a Soldier/Sailor/Airmen/Marine (or ANY veteran) who seeks help for PTSD? (I seem to remember something about this Administration already trying to go after the Veterans anyway...hmmm....ain't that a co-ink-ee-dink)

What about Police officers who are MANDATED to seek mental health counseling after a shooting incident?

What about Firefighters who seek counseling after pulling a child out of a burning building that dies afterwards?

What about someone going thru a divorce that seeks grief counseling?

What about all those kids who are pushed into seeking "counseling" after ANY incident in a public school?

What about ANYONE in a house where one person in the house seeks ANY type of counseling? (this has ALREADY happened...this "action" will only increase it)

What about ALL THE KIDS who have been "diagnosed" with ADD/ADHD once they reach the age of majority (that's 18 for those who went to public schools)?  They try to get a firearm for protection and "suddenly discover" they can't?

What about abused women who seek counseling after the fact?  Those women "suddenly discover" that they cannot protect themselves from an abusive husband?



Remember how Dhims work.....When they say they want to "protect you", they really want protection "from you".

This isn't a way to "help"...it's a outright back-door gun ban that won't get discovered by the great unwashed until AFTER the pot is boiling and the frog can't jump out.

KPTB's EA

It's illegal...first of all.  The way the Dhims work...they "make a law" they KNOW is unconstitutional, and then WE have to pay for the lawyers to get involved.

Now...."people in the business of firearms" now must get licensed to do commerce.....sounds nice doesn't it.  Well....if you SELL firearms, YOU ALREADY HAVE TO HAVE A FFL....so why is he doing an "action" that is already codified?   Well.....look at what is in italics....and think about how the Dhims work.

Does this NOW mean that businesses who manufacture "stuff" that is used for firearms (not the firearms themselves) HAVE TO GET PERMISSION and get a FFL?

Does this NOW mean that businesses that manufacture AMMO need to get an FFL?

Does this NOW mean that business that PRINT TARGETS on paper need to get an FFL?

Does this NOW mean that business that HOST GUN SHOWS need to get an FFL?

Does this NOW mean that publishers of Gun books and magazines need to get an FFL?

And

What about the new "law" that mandates that you lose your rights if a doctor reports you to the ATF?

well....let's think about how the Dhims work.

What if your Doctor "doesn't think" you should own a gun, or "thinks" that being a gun owner is bad....all he has to do is "click a button" and PRESTO!!!!...bye bye!....isn't that NEAT?

......questions questions questions.