Since the Dhims love to say that guns cause criminals (derrrr....yeah)....kinda like spoons make people fat......I'd like to use their way of thinking to illustrate something that is indeed more dangerous.
What do you notice about this top 20?
20 - East Palo Alto, CA - Mayor Donna Rutherford (D)
19 - Jackson, MS - Mayor Tony Yarber (D)
18 - Wilkes-Barre, PA - Mayor Thomas M. Leighton (D)
17 - Birmingham, AL - Mayor William A. Bell (D)
16 - East Point, GA - Mayor Jannquell Peters (D)
15 - East Chicago, IN - Mayor Anthony Copeland (D)
14 - Compton, CA - Mayor Aja Brown (D)
13 - Baltimore, MD - Mayor Stephanie C. Rawlings-Blake (D)
12 - St. Louis, MO - Mayor Francis G. Slay (D)
11 - Harvey, IL - Mayor Eric J. Kellogg (D)
10 - Newark, NJ - Mayor Ras J. Baraka (D)
9 - New Orleans, LA - Mayor Mitch Landrieu (D)
8 - Trenton, NJ - Mayor Eric Jackson (D)
7 - Detroit, MI - Mayor Mike Duggan (D)
6 - Flint, MI - Mayor Karen Weaver (D)
5 - Saginaw, MI - Mayor Dennis Browning
4 - Chester, PA - Mayor John Linder (D)
3 - Gary, IN - Mayor Karen Freeman-Wilson (D)
2 - Camden, NJ - Mayor Dana Redd (D)
1 - East St. Louis, IL - Mayor Emeka-Jackson Hicks (D)
See anything that is blatantly obvious?
Now.....what is this top 20 list?
It's the top 20 MURDER CITIES in these United States.
Now....you may notice the link goes to the top 30.....so the typical Dhim-wit would say "see...see,....that's manipulating the data".
well...
1. the top 20 are ALL Dhimocrat controlled. So that blows that arguement out
2. of the top 30, 28 are Dhimocrat controlled.....so again....I say "Correlation anyone?
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Which side?
A few questions:
When "a person" refuses to declare that terrorist acts are not the work of radical islam, which side does "a person" support?
When "a person" openly states that the terrorists are the victims, and that those that are the ACTUAL victims are the ones who are the oppressors, which side does "a person" support?
When "a person" openly apologizes to followers of islam that the group "a person" belongs to is to blame for criticizing islam, which side does "a person" support?
Who am I describing?
Well....actually two people.
1. KPTB
2. Shrillary
When "a person" refuses to declare that terrorist acts are not the work of radical islam, which side does "a person" support?
When "a person" openly states that the terrorists are the victims, and that those that are the ACTUAL victims are the ones who are the oppressors, which side does "a person" support?
When "a person" openly apologizes to followers of islam that the group "a person" belongs to is to blame for criticizing islam, which side does "a person" support?
Who am I describing?
Well....actually two people.
1. KPTB
2. Shrillary
Saturday, December 19, 2015
Mosques as weapons caches.....unpossible!
The frogs are starting to realize the pot is boiling.
http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.2241/france-close-down-3-mosques-334-war-grade-weapons-found-223-arrests.html
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/kalashnikov-ammunition-isis-propaganda-seized-after-paris-mosque-closure-1532108
...but remember, according to KPTB "This has nothing to do with Islam"
nothing to see here citizen, move along.
http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.2241/france-close-down-3-mosques-334-war-grade-weapons-found-223-arrests.html
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/kalashnikov-ammunition-isis-propaganda-seized-after-paris-mosque-closure-1532108
...but remember, according to KPTB "This has nothing to do with Islam"
nothing to see here citizen, move along.
Friday, December 18, 2015
Molon Labe
I am stealing this from Col Schlichter, but, considering the source, it's a definite "read this".
------------
Here’s What A Liberal ‘Gun-Grab’ Would Look Like And Why It Would Ultimately Fail
So, how do liberals get their wish for a disarmed, subservient population? Because all this talk of gun banning – and now they are finally admitting that they want to take our guns – raises some practical questions. Not least among them is how you get a hundred million-plus armed citizens to cheerfully turn over their firearms at the behest of a bunch of liberals who have nothing but contempt for normal Americans.
Let’s not focus on the political blowback – the massive mobilization of voters who suddenly take an interest in politics because their guns are threatened and vote in pro-freedom candidates. That’s already happening – the ranks of the NRA are swelling and there were 20 people waiting for the doors to open last weekend at a local Los Angeles gun shop.
Instead, let’s look at the practical obstacles to gun banning. The first is legal. Some jurisdiction passes a law infringing upon the right to keep and bear arms and those subjected to that injustice go to court to challenge it. But this is problematic. While the majority of Americans understand the Constitution’s Second Amendment to mean exactly what it says, liberals see the Constitution as less a foundational document than a list of suggestions to be disregarded as they become inconvenient.
Hillary is already making the repeal of the First Amendment a key part of her campaign – she doesn’t like that citizens are allowed to unite and make movies critical of her – and we’ve seen Obama heap contempt upon freedom of religion, due process, and the right to be free of unreasonable searches. Only a slim majority of the Supreme Court is even willing to enforce what the Second Amendment says, and it just recently refused to consider challenges to laws banning normal capacity magazines and that unicorn of the gun debate, “assault weapons.”
This means an American citizen stands a remote chance of being able to use the judicial process to protect his rights, and it is a grave injustice when a constitutionally-guaranteed freedom can simply be written out of the Bill of Rights by the courts’ refusal to enforce it. This reinforces the ultimate rationale for citizens keeping weapons – to maintain the ability to resist tyranny.
So, when the courts ignore our rights, it fuels, and provides moral justification for, the next problem gun grabbers would face – “Irish democracy.” Irish democracy is simply systemic noncompliance – people refuse to play along and cooperate with the unjust system. The government needs our cooperation. We generally believe our laws are just and that they were instituted fairly, and therefore usually feel morally obligated to obey. That’s why people stop at stop signs in the middle of nowhere; that’s why the self-reporting income tax system can function. America works on the honor system. But when the system is perceived as unjust, that ends.
Look at Connecticut’s obnoxious new gun laws banning whole categories of standard weapons. Law abiding citizens did not line up at the local police station to turn in their black rifles. They kept them. They just refused to comply. Now, Connecticut has not yet tried to send police house to house to collect these wicked tools. Mass sweeps for guns without warrants might even arouse the sensitivities of liberal judges who are willing to ignore the Second Amendment but balk at ignoring the Fourth.
But even if the government got over that hurdle, who do they send? Law enforcement is decentralized – the state can’t simply order local police departments and sheriffs to do the dirty work. Even assuming he’s not as outraged as his constituents, the local sheriff out in the country wants to be reelected, and sending his deputies farm to farm to please a bunch of big city liberals is a poor electoral strategy. A good number of chiefs and sheriffs would respond with impolite, anatomically challenging suggestions.
But assuming you find a willing agency head, you still have to get the beat cops to go get those guns. Good luck. Besides the many who would simply announce, “Hell no, I’m not doing it” (only to be fired and then initiate union agitation and budget-busting litigation), you would have a bunch who would simply not play along. They would call in sick. They would find an emergency to distract them. Or they would open a closet door, look over the three illegal AR-platform rifles, and announce “Nothing here.”
And if they did haul in some citizen for the crime of emulating America’s founders, it’s perfectly reasonable to expect that one of the twelve citizens in the box would comply with what would be an aggressive campaign by pro-freedom advocates to encourage jurors not to convict those accused of unconstitutional gun “crimes.” This kind of jury nullification already happens in urban drug cases.
Of course, whole municipal and state governments would refuse to cooperate. Today, 30 of the 50 states have Republican governors. The vast majority of the country is red – they are never going to pass such laws and, if the feds did, they may very well refuse to enforce them or assist the federal government in doing so. The governor of Texas announcing that the Lone Star state simply will not allow the enforcement of a gun ban within its borders is going to drive the liberals in Washington to distraction and guarantee him another term in office.
Then it could get ugly. The unique combination of ego, hatred for normal Americans, and bar-exam-failing stupidity of Hillary might cause her to try to use military force to crush resistance. Any effort to use massive force to impose the liberals’ vision of a gun-free Utopia faces the practical problem of a lot of armed Americans.
There are millions of Americas with guns, many of them veterans who know how to employ them. We would certainly see more Ruby Ridges and Wacos as people took up arms to resist, if not much, much worse. A dedicated effort to forcefully disarm our citizenry would cost lives on both the pro-freedom and pro-fascism sides.
But, before Hillary could employ the military, she’d have to contend with resistance from within its ranks. Our warriors signed on to kill America’s enemies, not other Americans whose beliefs are generally pretty close to those of our troops. Don’t count on our guys in uniform killing or dying to please a bunch of coastal liberals determined to turn American citizens into defenseless subjects. And the special snowflake spawn of the coastal elites certainly aren’t going to emerge from their safe spaces and gender studies seminars to suit up in Kevlar and kick in doors in Middle America.
So how do liberals get their wish for a disarmed, subservient population? They don’t.
(emphasis is mine)
https://journal.ijreview.com/2015/12/251122-kurt-liberal-gun-grab-why-fail/
------------
Here’s What A Liberal ‘Gun-Grab’ Would Look Like And Why It Would Ultimately Fail
So, how do liberals get their wish for a disarmed, subservient population? Because all this talk of gun banning – and now they are finally admitting that they want to take our guns – raises some practical questions. Not least among them is how you get a hundred million-plus armed citizens to cheerfully turn over their firearms at the behest of a bunch of liberals who have nothing but contempt for normal Americans.
Let’s not focus on the political blowback – the massive mobilization of voters who suddenly take an interest in politics because their guns are threatened and vote in pro-freedom candidates. That’s already happening – the ranks of the NRA are swelling and there were 20 people waiting for the doors to open last weekend at a local Los Angeles gun shop.
Instead, let’s look at the practical obstacles to gun banning. The first is legal. Some jurisdiction passes a law infringing upon the right to keep and bear arms and those subjected to that injustice go to court to challenge it. But this is problematic. While the majority of Americans understand the Constitution’s Second Amendment to mean exactly what it says, liberals see the Constitution as less a foundational document than a list of suggestions to be disregarded as they become inconvenient.
Hillary is already making the repeal of the First Amendment a key part of her campaign – she doesn’t like that citizens are allowed to unite and make movies critical of her – and we’ve seen Obama heap contempt upon freedom of religion, due process, and the right to be free of unreasonable searches. Only a slim majority of the Supreme Court is even willing to enforce what the Second Amendment says, and it just recently refused to consider challenges to laws banning normal capacity magazines and that unicorn of the gun debate, “assault weapons.”
This means an American citizen stands a remote chance of being able to use the judicial process to protect his rights, and it is a grave injustice when a constitutionally-guaranteed freedom can simply be written out of the Bill of Rights by the courts’ refusal to enforce it. This reinforces the ultimate rationale for citizens keeping weapons – to maintain the ability to resist tyranny.
So, when the courts ignore our rights, it fuels, and provides moral justification for, the next problem gun grabbers would face – “Irish democracy.” Irish democracy is simply systemic noncompliance – people refuse to play along and cooperate with the unjust system. The government needs our cooperation. We generally believe our laws are just and that they were instituted fairly, and therefore usually feel morally obligated to obey. That’s why people stop at stop signs in the middle of nowhere; that’s why the self-reporting income tax system can function. America works on the honor system. But when the system is perceived as unjust, that ends.
Look at Connecticut’s obnoxious new gun laws banning whole categories of standard weapons. Law abiding citizens did not line up at the local police station to turn in their black rifles. They kept them. They just refused to comply. Now, Connecticut has not yet tried to send police house to house to collect these wicked tools. Mass sweeps for guns without warrants might even arouse the sensitivities of liberal judges who are willing to ignore the Second Amendment but balk at ignoring the Fourth.
But even if the government got over that hurdle, who do they send? Law enforcement is decentralized – the state can’t simply order local police departments and sheriffs to do the dirty work. Even assuming he’s not as outraged as his constituents, the local sheriff out in the country wants to be reelected, and sending his deputies farm to farm to please a bunch of big city liberals is a poor electoral strategy. A good number of chiefs and sheriffs would respond with impolite, anatomically challenging suggestions.
But assuming you find a willing agency head, you still have to get the beat cops to go get those guns. Good luck. Besides the many who would simply announce, “Hell no, I’m not doing it” (only to be fired and then initiate union agitation and budget-busting litigation), you would have a bunch who would simply not play along. They would call in sick. They would find an emergency to distract them. Or they would open a closet door, look over the three illegal AR-platform rifles, and announce “Nothing here.”
And if they did haul in some citizen for the crime of emulating America’s founders, it’s perfectly reasonable to expect that one of the twelve citizens in the box would comply with what would be an aggressive campaign by pro-freedom advocates to encourage jurors not to convict those accused of unconstitutional gun “crimes.” This kind of jury nullification already happens in urban drug cases.
Of course, whole municipal and state governments would refuse to cooperate. Today, 30 of the 50 states have Republican governors. The vast majority of the country is red – they are never going to pass such laws and, if the feds did, they may very well refuse to enforce them or assist the federal government in doing so. The governor of Texas announcing that the Lone Star state simply will not allow the enforcement of a gun ban within its borders is going to drive the liberals in Washington to distraction and guarantee him another term in office.
Then it could get ugly. The unique combination of ego, hatred for normal Americans, and bar-exam-failing stupidity of Hillary might cause her to try to use military force to crush resistance. Any effort to use massive force to impose the liberals’ vision of a gun-free Utopia faces the practical problem of a lot of armed Americans.
There are millions of Americas with guns, many of them veterans who know how to employ them. We would certainly see more Ruby Ridges and Wacos as people took up arms to resist, if not much, much worse. A dedicated effort to forcefully disarm our citizenry would cost lives on both the pro-freedom and pro-fascism sides.
But, before Hillary could employ the military, she’d have to contend with resistance from within its ranks. Our warriors signed on to kill America’s enemies, not other Americans whose beliefs are generally pretty close to those of our troops. Don’t count on our guys in uniform killing or dying to please a bunch of coastal liberals determined to turn American citizens into defenseless subjects. And the special snowflake spawn of the coastal elites certainly aren’t going to emerge from their safe spaces and gender studies seminars to suit up in Kevlar and kick in doors in Middle America.
So how do liberals get their wish for a disarmed, subservient population? They don’t.
(emphasis is mine)
https://journal.ijreview.com/2015/12/251122-kurt-liberal-gun-grab-why-fail/
Thursday, December 17, 2015
Freddie Gray MisTrial in Baltimore
I've been "kinda" watching this for the last couple of months because, frankly, the level of stupidity of the citizens of Baltimore astound me.
So the judge has declared a Mis-trial, and the inevitable "R8CIST" comments instantly ensue from the stupids.
"Another group of protesters called police officers racist, chanting, "No justice, no peace" and, "All night, all day, we will fight for Freddie Gray."
alrighty then...so the stupids want to say this is a racist thing....that's REALLY FUNNY. Here is why.
1. The PoPo being charged (William Porter).......is black.
2. The chief of police (Anthony Batts).......is black
3. The prosecutor (Marilyn Mosby)..........is black
4. The Judge (Barry Williams).......is black
5. The Mayor (Stephanie Rawlings-Blake).....is black (hyphened last name usually means a Lib too)
............so.........how EXACTLY is this a racist thing?
So the judge has declared a Mis-trial, and the inevitable "R8CIST" comments instantly ensue from the stupids.
"Another group of protesters called police officers racist, chanting, "No justice, no peace" and, "All night, all day, we will fight for Freddie Gray."
alrighty then...so the stupids want to say this is a racist thing....that's REALLY FUNNY. Here is why.
1. The PoPo being charged (William Porter).......is black.
2. The chief of police (Anthony Batts).......is black
3. The prosecutor (Marilyn Mosby)..........is black
4. The Judge (Barry Williams).......is black
5. The Mayor (Stephanie Rawlings-Blake).....is black (hyphened last name usually means a Lib too)
............so.........how EXACTLY is this a racist thing?
Monday, December 14, 2015
SJW - Spoiled Jerks, Worthless
After reading this, and agreeing with everyting di Jamay-can-mon said:
http://thelibertyzone.com/2015/12/13/love-of-country/
The title of the post appeared in my brain. Social Justice Warriors are henceforth to be known as Spoiled Jerks, Worthless.
Friday, December 11, 2015
Next target: St Looey?
A whole buncha "uh-oh's" for the people of Missouri:
5 reports of large purchases of burner phones in Missouri (meaning 10-60 at a single purchase)
Lebanon MO (US54 out of JC to I-44) at 4am
Columbia MO (North of Lebanon) at 930pm
Macon MO (US 63) - 2 separate purchases
Jefferson City MO (US 63)
Cape Girardeu MO (South of St Louis off of I-55)
All of the men were "foreigners speaking a strange language"
TRANSLATED: Muslim
AND
Lots of propane tanks stolen from Lee's Summit (20 tanks) and Independence (28 tanks) (Southeastern and Eastern suburbs of KC).
but I'm sure their going to be used to cook up some ribs-n-chicken.....right?
ALSO
The two "missing" afghany student PILOTS from Moody AFB from Monday now have a FBI BOLO on them.....the FBI wouldn't do this unless they think "sumtin's up".
Ask yourself this: Why would the FBI issue a BOLO for two MUSLIM PILOTS?
Here is my "theory".....again, if you've got a little military experience this isn't real hard.
Name me a symbolic location in the midwest of Dar al Harb (that means house of war...the term used for the USofA) that would, if attacked/destroyed, be a HUGE political statement.
I'll give you some hints:
1. It's in the midwest (duh)
2. It's very large
3. It's symbolic of the west
4. It's VERY recognizable
5. It's hollow.
6. It's made of shiny metal
do-dah-do-dah-do-dah-do (Jeopardy music)
got it yet?
Answer: The St Louis Arch...the GATEWAY to the WEST (I REALLY HOPE that I am wrong on this)
or
The Rams/Lions game on Sunday Night (December 13th, 2015). (AGAIN....I REALLY HOPE I am wrong on this one too)
UPDATE: Monday, Dec 14th: Thank goodness I was wrong about the Rams game.
5 reports of large purchases of burner phones in Missouri (meaning 10-60 at a single purchase)
Lebanon MO (US54 out of JC to I-44) at 4am
Columbia MO (North of Lebanon) at 930pm
Macon MO (US 63) - 2 separate purchases
Jefferson City MO (US 63)
Cape Girardeu MO (South of St Louis off of I-55)
All of the men were "foreigners speaking a strange language"
TRANSLATED: Muslim
AND
Lots of propane tanks stolen from Lee's Summit (20 tanks) and Independence (28 tanks) (Southeastern and Eastern suburbs of KC).
but I'm sure their going to be used to cook up some ribs-n-chicken.....right?
ALSO
The two "missing" afghany student PILOTS from Moody AFB from Monday now have a FBI BOLO on them.....the FBI wouldn't do this unless they think "sumtin's up".
Ask yourself this: Why would the FBI issue a BOLO for two MUSLIM PILOTS?
Here is my "theory".....again, if you've got a little military experience this isn't real hard.
Name me a symbolic location in the midwest of Dar al Harb (that means house of war...the term used for the USofA) that would, if attacked/destroyed, be a HUGE political statement.
I'll give you some hints:
1. It's in the midwest (duh)
2. It's very large
3. It's symbolic of the west
4. It's VERY recognizable
5. It's hollow.
6. It's made of shiny metal
do-dah-do-dah-do-dah-do (Jeopardy music)
got it yet?
Answer: The St Louis Arch...the GATEWAY to the WEST (I REALLY HOPE that I am wrong on this)
or
The Rams/Lions game on Sunday Night (December 13th, 2015). (AGAIN....I REALLY HOPE I am wrong on this one too)
UPDATE: Monday, Dec 14th: Thank goodness I was wrong about the Rams game.
Thursday, December 10, 2015
How long until a Beslan in the US happens?
American Beslan:
Am I the only one who sees a problem here.
Shooters were "radicalized" before they met
Shooters have been in place and "discussing" attacks in 2012
StrawMan/Brother-In-Law by GreenCard Sham was on LE radar for the last year (it was an "inactive investigation")....never mind that the FBI has a THOUSAND ACTIVE investigations, and supposedly, Marquez "recently" converted to Islam. Also, his "russian" wife is Chechen (not confirmed yet since she has "mysteriously" disappeared).
Syed had "casing" photos of one of the local schools on his cell (luckily the PoPo didn't destroy that when the ventilated him)
Syed's job allowed him to "case" at least 11 schools and a local hospital.
A separate issue, but a OPLAN analysis of this: The Go-Pro Cameras (boxes in the car) haven't been located.
I think the filming was the primary mission of the attack...BECAUSE:
1. They had an ingress plan
2. They had an egress plan...which meant they INTENDED to get out before the police.
3. They had a plan for their child
4. They left IED's for the first responders (luckily those IEDs FAILED)
5. The GoPros "dissapeared" somewhere between Inland and when they confronted the PoPo
6. Since they had completed their mission, they needed to finish the operation by "Dying for Allah" in order to become "perfect muslims"
Now....IF this is indeed their plan (and ANYONE with a little bit of military planning skills coulda figured this out) Why do ya 'spose they wanted to FILM an attack on a Kafir's CHRISTMAS party?
AND...the PoPo still had a manhunt for a THIRD shooter (identified by multiple survivors) AFTER the Shooters were ventilated be the PoPo. So....where is this guy?
Am I the only one who sees a problem here.
Shooters were "radicalized" before they met
Shooters have been in place and "discussing" attacks in 2012
StrawMan/Brother-In-Law by GreenCard Sham was on LE radar for the last year (it was an "inactive investigation")....never mind that the FBI has a THOUSAND ACTIVE investigations, and supposedly, Marquez "recently" converted to Islam. Also, his "russian" wife is Chechen (not confirmed yet since she has "mysteriously" disappeared).
Syed had "casing" photos of one of the local schools on his cell (luckily the PoPo didn't destroy that when the ventilated him)
Syed's job allowed him to "case" at least 11 schools and a local hospital.
A separate issue, but a OPLAN analysis of this: The Go-Pro Cameras (boxes in the car) haven't been located.
I think the filming was the primary mission of the attack...BECAUSE:
1. They had an ingress plan
2. They had an egress plan...which meant they INTENDED to get out before the police.
3. They had a plan for their child
4. They left IED's for the first responders (luckily those IEDs FAILED)
5. The GoPros "dissapeared" somewhere between Inland and when they confronted the PoPo
6. Since they had completed their mission, they needed to finish the operation by "Dying for Allah" in order to become "perfect muslims"
Now....IF this is indeed their plan (and ANYONE with a little bit of military planning skills coulda figured this out) Why do ya 'spose they wanted to FILM an attack on a Kafir's CHRISTMAS party?
AND...the PoPo still had a manhunt for a THIRD shooter (identified by multiple survivors) AFTER the Shooters were ventilated be the PoPo. So....where is this guy?
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
I stole this from PopeHat, but it illustrates the point about those "enlightened" people who say we must "Ban Icky Assault Weapons"
It's hard to grasp the reaction of someone who understands gun terminology to someone who doesn't. So imagine we're going through one of our periodic moral panics over dogs and I'm trying to persuade you that there should be restrictions on, say, Rottweilers.
Me: I don't want to take away dog owners' rights. But we need to do something about Rottweilers.
You: So what do you propose?
Me: I just think that there should be some sort of training or restrictions on owning an attack dog.
You: Wait. What's an "attack dog?"
Me: You know what I mean. Like military dogs.
You: Huh? Rottweilers aren't military dogs. In fact "military dogs" isn't a thing. You mean like German Shepherds?
Me: Don't be ridiculous. Nobody's trying to take away your German Shepherds. But civilians shouldn't own fighting dogs.
You: I have no idea what dogs you're talking about now.
Me: You're being both picky and obtuse. You know I mean hounds.
You: What the fuck.
Me: OK, maybe not actually ::air quotes:: hounds ::air quotes::. Maybe I have the terminology wrong. I'm not obsessed with vicious dogs like you. But we can identify kinds of dogs that civilians just don't need to own.
You: Can we?
Because I'm just talking out of my ass, the impression I convey is that I want to ban some arbitrary, uninformed category of dogs that I can't articulate. Are you comfortable that my rule is going to be drawn in a principled, informed, narrow way?
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
"Common Sense" legislation
Why is it, that when a Dhimocrap uses the "common sense" line, I always think:
"If it is SO common sense, why is it something that must be forced upon the commoner?"
"If it is SO common sense, why is it something that must be forced upon the commoner?"
Fiddler, meet your fiddle
The LSM is so worked up over Trump's latest on banning Muslims from coming into the country.
Basically, the LSM is saying that it's "not fair" if someone want's to exercise "their rights" to enter These United States, they shouldn't be put on a "secret list"
Ummmm
What did KPTB just say in his recent lecture from the Oval?
That he wants to make it so that a citizen cannot exercise their ACTUAL rights when put on a "secret list"
Really LSM?
Trump is a Fiddler....and the LSM is the fiddle
ALSO,
What Trump is proposing is ALREADY CODIFIED into law
18 USC 1182
(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Basically, the LSM is saying that it's "not fair" if someone want's to exercise "their rights" to enter These United States, they shouldn't be put on a "secret list"
Ummmm
What did KPTB just say in his recent lecture from the Oval?
That he wants to make it so that a citizen cannot exercise their ACTUAL rights when put on a "secret list"
Really LSM?
Trump is a Fiddler....and the LSM is the fiddle
ALSO,
What Trump is proposing is ALREADY CODIFIED into law
18 USC 1182
(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Monday, December 7, 2015
"I DARE YOU"
I am reposting this. I ONEHUNDREDANDFIFTYPERCENT in agreement with Former Congressman Walsh. I stand with him:
I DARE YOU!
I DARE YOU!
Congressman to Loretta Lynch “Prosecute Me”The day after Muslim terrorists killed 14 Americans, Attorney General Loretta Lynch vowed to prosecute anyone who uses “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”
What the hell does that mean? I have a 1st Amendment right, Ms Lynch, to say whatever I want about Muslims.
You want to try and prosecute me for what I say? I dare you. Here goes:
Most Muslims around the world are terrorists, support terrorism, and/or support Sharia Law. They are our enemy. I don’t want them in America. Any Muslim that won’t assimilate should get the hell out of America. Any Muslim that is a terrorist or supports terrorism should be killed. If “Moderate” Muslims don’t speak out against terrorism, they are our enemy and we should call them out and kick them out of this country. I hope there is a backlash against Muslims because Islam, as practiced by most Muslims, is not a religion of peace, and all of us who do live in peace should do whatever we can to defeat Islam.
There Ms Lynch. As an American, I have a right to say everything I just did. And I will continue to speak the truth about Islam in the hopes that others will wake up to this truth and do what we can to defeat this evil in our midst.
Is that “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence”. Go ahead and prosecute me. I dare you.
Posted by Joe Walsh on Friday, December 4, 2015
Now....the next question. Do YOU stand with him too?
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Of course.....he uses the time to pitch gun control
Just prior to SNF, KPTB goes on the boob-tube (how appropriate for him) to lecture us with his "it's not the fault of Islam" speech. Of course he HAS TO pitch his gun control agenda....since his efforts in Syria, and Iraq, and Iran, and Afghanistan, and Libya, and with Boko Haram, and the JV Team, and Obamacare, and Putin, and his "awesome vetting process"...ahem.....which led to San Bernanadino no less, and his handling of the economy.
(BTW: Did you notice that he used a lectern, not the desk?...how many other Prezbo's have done an OO speech from a lectern? Image is EVERYTHING with these people)
So...he wants to make it that IF you are on the no-fly list, you can't exercise your rights as an American.....hmmmm....it "just sounds so special" doesn't it. Well the Dhims and the LSM and the LIV that aren't paying attention would have you think so.
BUT!!!!
1. There is no "control" for the No-Fly-List....meaning, if some bureaucrat (let's just call him Barack) doesn't like your particular "view" of the way he does things, he can just "convieniently" add your name to the list and....PRESTO.....no more 2nd, 4th, or 5th amendment for you sucka!! You are now BANNED from defending yourself. Banned from unreasonable search. Banned from an actual legal trial and facing your accuser...rather, you are now guilty until YOU provide proof of innocence because "someone" doesn't think you should have those rights.
Add to that, just after San Bernadino, KPTB's newly installed Attorney General of the Department of Just-Us has stated that she will prosecute "anti-Muslim rhetoric"....in other words....prosecute free speech...so...there goes your 1st amedment protections as well.
2. There is NO WAY for you, the citizen to know you are even on the list, find out WHO put your name on the list, find out WHY your name is on the list, or even have your name removed from the list. When the late Senator "Hiccup" Kennedy's name got put on the list, it took his staff more than THREE WEEKS to get it removed.. Now....how long would it take someone who was NOT from KPTB's party who doesn't have "connections" in DeeCee to accomplish the same thing?
Now it doesn't sound so cool does it?
BUT, that is what the NYT, and Slate, and TheNation, and Politico, and EVERY OTHER LSM outlet is going to try to pitch.
BTW, there are SEVENTY TWO (72) Department of Homeland Security employees on the No-Fly List!!! ......ummm....anyone see a problem here?
Having said that....I've got a question: How would his "push" have stopped San Bernadino, the Chattanooga Recruiting Station, Fort Hood, the Tsarnev's (they used guns too), the DC Navy yard, Oregon, or any other "workplace violence" that has happened in These United States?
ANSWER: ZERO, none, nada, nyet
So, if it's something that wouldn't stop the ACTUAL Terrorists (who don't obey laws anyway)....WHY would he want a way to "instantly" ban his opponents ability to defend themselves, quell their speech, search them at his whim, and not be able to face an accuser made so easily available?
Gee....I just wonder
(BTW: Did you notice that he used a lectern, not the desk?...how many other Prezbo's have done an OO speech from a lectern? Image is EVERYTHING with these people)
So...he wants to make it that IF you are on the no-fly list, you can't exercise your rights as an American.....hmmmm....it "just sounds so special" doesn't it. Well the Dhims and the LSM and the LIV that aren't paying attention would have you think so.
BUT!!!!
1. There is no "control" for the No-Fly-List....meaning, if some bureaucrat (let's just call him Barack) doesn't like your particular "view" of the way he does things, he can just "convieniently" add your name to the list and....PRESTO.....no more 2nd, 4th, or 5th amendment for you sucka!! You are now BANNED from defending yourself. Banned from unreasonable search. Banned from an actual legal trial and facing your accuser...rather, you are now guilty until YOU provide proof of innocence because "someone" doesn't think you should have those rights.
Add to that, just after San Bernadino, KPTB's newly installed Attorney General of the Department of Just-Us has stated that she will prosecute "anti-Muslim rhetoric"....in other words....prosecute free speech...so...there goes your 1st amedment protections as well.
2. There is NO WAY for you, the citizen to know you are even on the list, find out WHO put your name on the list, find out WHY your name is on the list, or even have your name removed from the list. When the late Senator "Hiccup" Kennedy's name got put on the list, it took his staff more than THREE WEEKS to get it removed.. Now....how long would it take someone who was NOT from KPTB's party who doesn't have "connections" in DeeCee to accomplish the same thing?
Now it doesn't sound so cool does it?
BUT, that is what the NYT, and Slate, and TheNation, and Politico, and EVERY OTHER LSM outlet is going to try to pitch.
BTW, there are SEVENTY TWO (72) Department of Homeland Security employees on the No-Fly List!!! ......ummm....anyone see a problem here?
Having said that....I've got a question: How would his "push" have stopped San Bernadino, the Chattanooga Recruiting Station, Fort Hood, the Tsarnev's (they used guns too), the DC Navy yard, Oregon, or any other "workplace violence" that has happened in These United States?
ANSWER: ZERO, none, nada, nyet
So, if it's something that wouldn't stop the ACTUAL Terrorists (who don't obey laws anyway)....WHY would he want a way to "instantly" ban his opponents ability to defend themselves, quell their speech, search them at his whim, and not be able to face an accuser made so easily available?
Gee....I just wonder
Attacks increase?
I just read this article on NYSlimes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/us/politics/california-attack-has-us-rethinking-strategy-on-homegrown-terror.html?
in the article, there is a REALLY interesting graphic (copied below in case it "mysteriously" dissapears from the NYT website)
Notice a "sudden" change in the frequency in attacks at the end of 2008?
Ask yourself this: What changed at the end of 2008/start of 2009?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/us/politics/california-attack-has-us-rethinking-strategy-on-homegrown-terror.html?
in the article, there is a REALLY interesting graphic (copied below in case it "mysteriously" dissapears from the NYT website)
Notice a "sudden" change in the frequency in attacks at the end of 2008?
Ask yourself this: What changed at the end of 2008/start of 2009?
Is our leadership's goal to WIN or to LOSE?
Here is HOW TO WIN.
1. You identify that you are AT WAR.
2. You NAME your ENEMY.
3. You go to your ENEMY and YOU KILL THEM. If you KNOW where they are, you deliver a KILL shot. You DESTROY their ability to wage war on you. If you have to level their cities, you level their cities.
4. You DO NOT apologize.
5. You DO NOT read them their miranda rights.
6. You DO NOT play nice so that you don't hurt their feelings.
7. You DO NOT tell them when you are leaving.
8. You DO NOT telegraph your intentions by dropping leaflets 45 minutes before you bomb them.
9. If they ask for a HUDNA, you BOMB THEM even more.
10. If the attempt a HIJRAH, you carpet bomb them during their attempt.
If your leaders do not follow these rules, your intent is TO LOSE.
Ask yourself this: Which method is our current feckless leader following?
1. You identify that you are AT WAR.
2. You NAME your ENEMY.
3. You go to your ENEMY and YOU KILL THEM. If you KNOW where they are, you deliver a KILL shot. You DESTROY their ability to wage war on you. If you have to level their cities, you level their cities.
4. You DO NOT apologize.
5. You DO NOT read them their miranda rights.
6. You DO NOT play nice so that you don't hurt their feelings.
7. You DO NOT tell them when you are leaving.
8. You DO NOT telegraph your intentions by dropping leaflets 45 minutes before you bomb them.
9. If they ask for a HUDNA, you BOMB THEM even more.
10. If the attempt a HIJRAH, you carpet bomb them during their attempt.
If your leaders do not follow these rules, your intent is TO LOSE.
Ask yourself this: Which method is our current feckless leader following?
Thursday, December 3, 2015
San Bernadino
I decided to wait this out a day before posting......basically because I wanted to see if what the media was saying versus what I "thought" would pan out is still spot on. Here is what the LSM has said
1. Two "white guys" (funny considering they were wearing ski masks)
2. Long guns were used (and they didn't "immediately" identify the AR/M4 platform "assault rifle")
3. "Black Yukon"
Now....what I think will pan out.
1. Muslim men (and maybe women)
UPDATE: Suspects Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik (obviously right wing christians) are dead
2. AK platform
UPDATE: Well...missed that one...sorta... ATF sez the weapons they used WERE NOT purchased by the shooters, and were ILLEGAL in the state of Cali. I thought that Gun-Control-Laws stopped this....hudathunk?
3. Yukon was a cut-out with cold plates
4. It will be in another GFZ
MORE:
Political Correctness will kill us all!!
A man who has been working in the area said he noticed a half-dozen Middle Eastern men in the area in recent weeks, but decided not to report anything since he did not wish to racially profile those people."
The shooter's killed the same people who threw them a baby shower for their 6 month old.....must be workplace violence.
They left IEDs at the scene and their house was a massive bomb factory.....obviously they were Mormons.
Syed recently memorized the Quran......he must be a tea-partier.
What is happening in the media is the intentional mis-direction of the Murican public....the majority of the MSM is still saying the "motive is unknown".....BULLSHIT!. The law enforcement "upper echelon" (meaning politicians) refuse to admit this is Jihad. The "upper echelon" of the FBI refuse to admit this is Jihad. KPTB was actually on CBS just prior to the attack telling the Murican public "It won't happen here". Folks......we are being LIED TO.....this is what is known as "acceptable casualties" in a war against the Murican public. The Jihadi's are the cannon fodder for it.
Here are some of the "narratives" that I've seen so far to try to paint this as "not" jihad:
They must be pro-lifers...after all, this happened right next door to a PP center.
except it wasn't pro-lifers, and the PP center was over a mile away....whoops.
We NEED more gun control to stop this!
except Cali has the strictest gun control in the US (on par with France I might add).....how well did that work out?.....whoops
It's workplace violence!!
except this was a meticulously planned and executed strike...including ingress and egress plans, and the wearing of body armor and Go-Pro Cams (for later D/L to you-boob), as well as leaving IEDs for the Po-Po when they showed up...not exactly the description for Workplace violence.....whoops
1. Two "white guys" (funny considering they were wearing ski masks)
2. Long guns were used (and they didn't "immediately" identify the AR/M4 platform "assault rifle")
3. "Black Yukon"
Now....what I think will pan out.
1. Muslim men (and maybe women)
UPDATE: Suspects Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik (obviously right wing christians) are dead
2. AK platform
UPDATE: Well...missed that one...sorta... ATF sez the weapons they used WERE NOT purchased by the shooters, and were ILLEGAL in the state of Cali. I thought that Gun-Control-Laws stopped this....hudathunk?
3. Yukon was a cut-out with cold plates
4. It will be in another GFZ
MORE:
Political Correctness will kill us all!!
A man who has been working in the area said he noticed a half-dozen Middle Eastern men in the area in recent weeks, but decided not to report anything since he did not wish to racially profile those people."
The shooter's killed the same people who threw them a baby shower for their 6 month old.....must be workplace violence.
They left IEDs at the scene and their house was a massive bomb factory.....obviously they were Mormons.
Syed recently memorized the Quran......he must be a tea-partier.
What is happening in the media is the intentional mis-direction of the Murican public....the majority of the MSM is still saying the "motive is unknown".....BULLSHIT!. The law enforcement "upper echelon" (meaning politicians) refuse to admit this is Jihad. The "upper echelon" of the FBI refuse to admit this is Jihad. KPTB was actually on CBS just prior to the attack telling the Murican public "It won't happen here". Folks......we are being LIED TO.....this is what is known as "acceptable casualties" in a war against the Murican public. The Jihadi's are the cannon fodder for it.
Here are some of the "narratives" that I've seen so far to try to paint this as "not" jihad:
They must be pro-lifers...after all, this happened right next door to a PP center.
except it wasn't pro-lifers, and the PP center was over a mile away....whoops.
We NEED more gun control to stop this!
except Cali has the strictest gun control in the US (on par with France I might add).....how well did that work out?.....whoops
It's workplace violence!!
except this was a meticulously planned and executed strike...including ingress and egress plans, and the wearing of body armor and Go-Pro Cams (for later D/L to you-boob), as well as leaving IEDs for the Po-Po when they showed up...not exactly the description for Workplace violence.....whoops
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)