That’s the liberals worst blindspot and weakness.. why when they lose, they lose so badly and lose so unexpectedly,.. they can’t process, that any nonliberal could actually be intelligent, let alone smarter than they are.
This is also why everything that is "bad" for the Democrat Party is "UNEXPECTED". Next time you hear that buzzword from the LSM, you will understand why.
It’s beyond annoying that they are this profoundly elitist, that kind of prejudiced. It can so often be an advantage. They just can’t help themselves. I can remember them still talking about victory the day before Mr. Reagan won 49 states.. They just can’t understand why they could lose to “cavemen” and “knuckle draggers”….
Why they went collectively nuts when we won,.. why they persist in telling the world that we “STEAL” elections with wild eyed conspiracy theories involving Diebold voting machines,.. classic liberal projection, since the only hard proof of election fraud shows that it’s a democrat endeavor pretty exclusively.
When you have a barely adequate IQ, but have through constant repetition taught yourself and all your fellow liberals that you are the smartest person EVAH!… it’s impossible to walk that back. Their entire self esteem is based on a lie, a provable lie… but they cannot let it go.. sure they have an occasional intelligent person, but the closed mind, is one unable to learn or adapt.. that some of the best and brightest minds on the SCOTUS, in think tanks, in Business, in the Military Officer Corps.. the Non commissioned officer ranks… They choose academia and pop culture media and journalism.. we chose the parts of the nation which actually produce visible results.
They choose the ones which produce non-tangibles, like imagery, and narrative..
It’s a telling difference, yet it gives them the opportunity to impose a false template on the nation of their choosing. One where a college lecturer is of greater value than a man who creates wealth for many people by restructuring companies and saving jobs,.. of more value than governors with executive experience. more value than Generals who serve under him, yet have produced victories in a badly mishandled conflict.. greater worth than any other discipline than that of a socialist community rabble rouser..
The man was never a full Constitutional Professor at Harvard, yet that lie lives on.. They sold him as the smartest president ever since the first one..
Yet have kept his college grades sealed by court order.....hmmmm
and no one at Harvard or Columbia even remembers him or attended one of his lectures.....hmmmmm
His recent "off TOTUS" speech reveals he is as dimwitted as many feared, an ideologue of immense proportions.. he simply ain’t all that smart. That will become easier to see as the next election nears, as his temper flairs more often.
What you have to understand is the the President's speeches are almost always a fill-in-the-blank, based on which LIVs he is addressing:
Tout/alleged what he's already done.
Say the public's in his corner.
Demand Congress do something.
Lament Washington dysfunction.
Lay out his own plan.
Avoid details.
Urge voters to keep up the pressure.
Warn it won't be easy.
Bask in the applause.
It's the fill-in-the-blank approach to selling a presidential agenda: same template, just adjusted for the topic and the LIV
