Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Duty to protect

Interesting article,

PoPo tells victim to put down his stick (the stick is ARMS, as in keep and bear).
Victim complies
Perp whacks Victim in the head with a metal baseball bat....Victim dies.
Dad of Victim is now suing Police for failure to protect (which he SHOULD WIN)


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/08/11/police-interference-with-persons-self-defense-when-he-is-faced-with-imminent-danger-plus-failure-to-protect-him-against-the-danger-may-be-unconstitutional/

So, let's take this a step further.

Since the PoPo did not allow decedant to keep and bear arms (KABA), this now means that anytime someone is not allowed to KABA, the party responsible for this now has a duty to protect.....hmmmm

Now....about those Gun-Free-Zones.......

and also,

since the Perp used a metal bat, does that mean that now we must have universal background checks, waiting periods, liability insurance, a one-bat-per-month purchase, registration, bat safety course, and a ban on "assault bats" (defined: bats with black rubber grips), and ownership of metal bats based on NEEDS?  So if we don't belong to a baseball or softball league, we are PROHIBITED from owning metal bats?....or do we only get to use bats if we are part of the National Guard?

questions
questions
questions